Friday I saw a WSJ article about the strong rumors that the Department of Justice and the "Agency" grouping of Apple and Big 5 publishers back in Jan. 2010 are likely to settle soon, before the U.S. Dept of Justice goes ahead with the lawsuit they've mentioned strongly.
Reuters writes it could happen "in the next few weeks" and they have two sources "close to the negotiations" though no one's said which side of the issue the two sources are. It doesn't seem likely to me (but who knows?) that Apple/Big5-associated would leak a rumor that they are working toward a settlement in which they'd need to give up some of their control over retailer prices.
' While negotiations are still fluid, the settlement is expected to eliminate Apple's so-called "most favored nation" status, which had prevented the publishers from selling lower-priced e-books through rival retailers such as Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) or Barnes & Noble Inc (BKS.N), the people said. '
Most news writers agree that both Amazon and customers would benefit from a move back to something like the "wholesale model" that had been in effect for decades before February 2010. In fact, under the wholesale arrangement all these years, the publisher set the retail price and Amazon paid 50% of that, period. 50% of the publisher's suggested selling price.
No matter what you read about how the publisher should have the right to set the price, the publisher had always set the suggested retail price upon which the 50% they received from retailers (Amazon, B&N, etc.) was based (an average $26 at the time), and then it was up to the retailer to sell those books at whatever price worked for them, since the publisher's share was already allocated. Sometimes there were loss leaders in the most popular books (New York Times Bestsellers) and sometimes prices were higher for books that were sold in fewer quantities.
There is a LOT more in that Reuters article, upon which most news articles were based this weekend.
NPR Panel - a good point made
A transcript of a panel discussing the DOJ vs Apple/Big5 dynamics
David Young, the CEO of Hachette, gets only one sentence in that transcript:
' There was no future, as I saw it, at 9.99 other than ruin. 'Dr. James McQuivey, VP and principal analyst at Forrester Research had this to say:
[LYNN} NEARY: If publishers price the e-book right, says McQuivey, there's a good chance they'll attract more customers.
MCQUIVEY: And the economics of getting 10 times as many people to pay 5.99 are actually favorable. But the publishers don't want that because then it would make you think, well, wait a minute, why is the paper copy 24.99? I'm never going to buy one of those again. And they're just not ready for that hard switchover yet, even though they know it's coming. '
Since publishers have been very open about their concern that Amazon's lower pricing on e-books would devalue their printed books, that seems a good point.
On an e-book with publisher's suggested retail price of $26, for which Amazon or B&N then used to pay 50% to the publisher, the publisher and author income (if enough of the revenue was passed down to the author) would be more than they're currently getting. The issue has been control and keeping the value of hardcover and paperback books higher. The issue hasn't been publisher or author revenue on e-books.
Related article
TIMELINE: Ebook Pricing Wars - what DOJ would have seen - March 12, 2012
Kindle Touch 3G, US-only Kindle Touch WiFi (US) Kindle Touch WiFi-Only, outside US
Kindle Keybd 3G (UK: Kindle Keybd 3G) K3 Special Offers K3-3G Special Offers DX
Check often: Temporarily-free recently published ones
Guide to finding Free Kindle books and Sources. Top 100 free bestsellers. Liked-books under $1
UK-Only: recently published free books, bestsellers, or £5 Max ones
Also, UK customers should see the UK store's Top 100 free bestsellers.
*Click* to Return to the HOME PAGE. Or click on the web browser's BACK button
0 komentar: On Kindle News: US Dept. of Justice and Apple/Big5 may settle soon. The issues.
Posting Komentar